Saturday, March 28, 2009

Taliban attack NATO supply lines in northwest Pakistan

From Bill Roggio at

"The Long War."

The Taliban have temporarily shut down NATO's main supply route into Afghanistan after damaging a bridge in Pakistan's Khyber agencies. The strike coincided with an attack on a truck terminal in Peshawar that is used by NATO supply convoys.

A bridge that served as "a key road link" between the provincial capital of Peshawar and the Torkham border crossing was damaged after being struck by a mortar, Daily Times reported. The damage has forced the bridge in the Landi Kotal region to be shut down. The closure has halted the flow of NATO supplies into Afghanistan.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

The President's Press Conference I

I guess I have to admit that the Press is not throwing softballs at Obama today.  But I really don't understand how the President is going to help us lower the deficit by dramatically increasing and the deficit.  Maybe it's counterintuitive, or maybe its suicide.

I also cannot understand how addressing health care issues is going to be a frugal step - something that is supposed to help us.  I keep getting a vision of healthcare run by the TSA or the Post Office, by folks who know not a whit about healthcare.

The President's Press Conference II

I predict a steep drop in the markets tomorrow as a result of the rather scary scenario painted by the President tonight on what he plans to do to healthcare, but more importantly, what he is about to do to the tax code.

The so called "rich" will stop buying real estate, and will slow or stop their charitable contributions under the President's plan, supported by a very willing left wing Congress.  If we pull out of this economic morass, it will be in spite of these attempts to "help" the middle class.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Huh!? The Economy is Wha!? What Planet is He on?

I like this picture from the Fox News web page this evening.

Actually, I thought McCain was kind of dopey for saying something like this during the campaign, but I think I knew what he meant at the time.  I expected average voters to consider him disengaged and overly optimistic, and they did in droves.  I do think now that Obama is stating the same indicates that the wheels have fallen off the cart - and so soon!  Too bad; despite his hyperliberalism, I had higher hopes in him than this.  Not to mention the constant and ugly barrage of left wing decrees.

You may recall my worry that he was an activist, though at the time the idea was poo-pooed by many.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

A Belated Happy 200th

Abraham Lincoln, if alive today, would have reached his 200th birthday last month.  Andrew Ferguson of the Weekly Standard has a piece on those who make themselves out to be a modern day Lincoln, including Mario Cuomo and none other than His Royal El Presidente.

A snippet:

Mario Cuomo has written one book (Why Lincoln Matters) and edited another (Lincoln on Democracy) dedicated to the proposition that Abraham Lincoln is a lot like Mario Cuomo. But he recently revised his view. Lincoln is actually a lot like Barack Obama. Cuomo listed the similarities in an op-ed that appeared in Newsday on Inauguration Day.

"Obama, like Lincoln, rejects rigid ideology in policymaking," Cuomo wrote. Both presidents declared their preference for "common sense" and "pragmatism," in stark contrast to those presidents who have declared their opposition to common sense and pragmatism. Accordingly, Cuomo went on, "Obama .  .  . like Lincoln, will not hesitate to call for substantial governmental assistance in the effort to right the Ship of State."

"Obama, like Lincoln, has superb personal gifts." These include a keen mind, poise under pressure, a prose style that sings, and a gift for delivering tub-thumpers. Both Obama and Lincoln lacked significant executive experience, Cuomo pointed out; both were political underdogs; and both were raised in "modest circumstances"--Lincoln on subsistence farms that were largely unchanged since the Iron Age, and Obama at a prep school in Honolulu, followed by Columbia University and Harvard Law School.

And then there's the shared mistrust of military force. "Lincoln knew, as Obama surely does, that we cannot end terror here [or] in the Middle East .  .  . just by having the world's most powerful weapons and the best fighting force." To sum up, Cuomo said, "Obama .  .  . shares Lincoln's extraordinary vision."

And yet, Cuomo added, and yet: There's a difference between these two pacific, statist, pragmatic presidents--these underdogs under the skin. Obama, taking office, has a tougher job than Lincoln ever did. Obama faces environmental disaster, genocide, worldwide hunger, and a "serious recession." Lincoln, Cuomo wrote, had only "one issue" to resolve. That would be the Civil War.

The declared similarities among Lincoln, Cuomo, and Obama will strike some of us as implausible. But Cuomo's view of Lincoln is already popular and gaining ground, here at the bicentennial of his birth. George McGovern, to cite another antique Democrat, wrote on Lincoln's birthday that Lincoln was a forerunner of Obama-like "change" and the perfect antidote to neo- conservatism. Opinion-slingers from Election Day onward made the same point--including the president himself, who after his election evoked Lincoln so often that he began to seem like a boy bouncing on tiptoe, shoulders thrown back, measuring his height against Dad's.

And so what? Americans are always trying to remake their greatest president in their own image. From the bottomless hamper of historical evidence we pick the scraps that can be stitched together to make the Lincoln of our dreams. Christians find Lincoln the prayerful mystic, military men see Lincoln the brilliant strategist of war, politicians buck themselves up with Lincoln the wily and beneficent leader, and even gay activists see, if not Lincoln the gay activist, then at least a Lincoln who was actively gay. So why not a Lincoln dolled up as a liberal Democrat circa 2009?

As if on cue, Ronald C. White appears with his new biography. A former professor at the San Francisco Theological Seminary, he has made an 800-page attempt to do what Cuomo did in an 800-word op-ed. It arrives amid an unstoppable and apparently endless torrent of Lincoln books roaring out of the warehouses, so blinding it becomes hard to tell them apart: "Which would be best for Father's Day--November 1862: Lincoln's Month of Change or July 1863: Lincoln and the Month that Changed America or maybe The First Half of the Second Week of May 1864: The Bloody Four or Five Days that Changed Lincoln?"

A. Lincoln: A Biography stands apart from all these, however. It has the potential to fix the Cuomoized Lincoln in the popular imagination for a long time to come.

This is mostly a matter of good timing. Every 15 or 20 years, a new cradle-to-grave, one-volume Lincoln biography like White's comes along, claiming to be the "standard life," as the booksellers used to say. If the public likes it, it takes its place in an ancient line of succession. One standard life displaces an earlier standard life, and then in time it is itself displaced by a still newer standard life. Lincoln the Unknown by Dale Carnegie held the position from the 1930s to the early 1950s, when Benjamin Thomas dethroned it with Abraham Lincoln: A Biography (still the best life of Lincoln in print). Thomas was bumped in the mid-seventies by Stephen B. Oates and his With Malice Toward None, which was pushed aside by David Herbert Donald'sLincoln in 1995. At age 14, Donald's book has grown whiskers--gotten stale, I should probably say--so White's book arrives at just the right moment. USA Today has already declared it the go-to bio.

"If you read one book about Lincoln," said the reviewer, "make it A. Lincoln."

Be my guest to read the rest,...

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]