The Senescent Man

Exquisite piece in today's (Wednesday's) Wall Street Journal Editorial Page (paid online subscription required) written by Costas Synolakis, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Southern California, on the history of tsunamis and the past reaction to their devastation. Some excerpts:

In the aftermath of the horrific Asian tsunamis of Dec. 26, which have killed more than all 20th-century tsunamis combined, many attempts will be made to place blame or quickly "fix" this problem. A little reflection on the history of past reaction to destructive tsunamis may help....

...The images from Sri Lanka, India and Thailand that have filled our screens--and the descriptions from survivors--are sadly all too familiar, at least to those of us who have conducted tsunami field surveys. At times, some of us thought that we were revisiting images from Flores in 1992, or East Java in 1994, Irian Jaya in 1996, Papua New Guinea in 1998 and Vanuatu in 1999--to just mention catastrophes in countries with similar landscape and coastal construction....

...The response of local [Sri Lankan] residents and tourists, however, was unfamiliar, at least to tsunami field scientists for post-1990s tsunamis. In one report, swimmers felt the current associated with the leading depression wave approaching the beach, yet hesitated about getting out of the water because of the "noise" and the fear that there was an earthquake and they would be safer away from buildings. They had to be told by tourists from Japan--a land where an understanding of tsunamis is now almost hard-wired in the genes--to run to high ground. In another report, vacationers spending the day on Phi Phi were taken back to Phuket one hour after the event started. In many cases tsunami waves persist for several hours, and the transport was nothing less than grossly irresponsible.

Contrast these reactions with what happened in Vanuatu, in 1999. On Pentecost Island, a rather pristine enclave with no electricity or running water, the locals watch television once a week, when a pickup truck with a satellite dish, a VCR and a TV stops by each village. When the International Tsunami Survey Team visited days after the tsunami, they heard that the residents had watched a Unesco video prepared the year before, in the aftermath of the 1998 Papua New Guinea tsunami disaster. When they felt the ground shake during the 1999 earthquake, they ran to a hill nearby. The tsunami swept through, razing the village to the ground. Out of 500 people, only three died, and all three had been unable to run like the others. The tsunami had hit at night.

// posted by The Senescent Man @ 9:07 AM 0 Comments

Here is an excellent living site, a blog no less, which provides detailed information on the Southeast Asia earthquake and the resulting tsumani including the latest news, information, resources, aid, donations and volunteer efforts. HT: Hugh Hewitt.

The 400m asteroid on a potential collision course with Earth now has been determined to be in an orbit that will miss the planet in April 2029. Images from several months earlier were found in archives and helped to refine the calculations. The probability of a strike (this time) has diminished to zero.

However, the chance of being hit by something big enough to cause widespread damage at some point in the future is a certainty. In fact, On Dec. 22 a smaller object of a few meters diameter was detected AFTER it had passed Earth at about 20,000 miles distance. Only with enough advance notice can we do anything to deflect the intruders. There was much unnecessary destruction from the recent tsunami because of the lack of early warning systems in the Indian Ocean. An impact early warning system is functioning now on a limited budget, but deserves more attention than it has been getting.

With Christmas observations and now the tsunami in Indonesia, the news outlets seem to have missed a huge story, that of a 400m asteroid with a 2.7% chance of colliding with the Earth on April 13, 2029. Read more about it here

More observations are needed to confirm the orbit and refine the calculations, but this object is potentially devastating, albeit just under 25 years from now. Should it hit an ocean, the most likely event if it hits at all, yesterday's tsunami will be a pond ripple in comparison.

As of now the likelihood of a near miss is still a very large at 97% and even if that shrinks we have over two decades and existing technology to nudge the asteroid out of its current track. Such a project will get a lot more attention if the odds change to our disadvantage. Stay tuned...

Well, we received roughly ten inches of snow overnight, and The Senescent Man was out shoveling this morning, mainly to extricate the autos and to get at least one of the Senescent progeny off to work. But it was good therapy, though risky business for an aging old coot like me. I did receive some help from the Senescent wife and son, but there is something about the clean, fresh sparkle of snow, and the amount of time you spend with it, that is therapeutic, illuminating and refreshing, and drives one back to the plow.

Despite the snow, it was not so bad a morning, I might add, as awakening to the aftermath of a tsunami caused by an earthquake registering 9.4 on the Richter scale -- one of the top 5 of the last 100 years -- which resulted in over 22,000 deaths, over half of which, from Sri Lanka. A horrible tragedy, which could have been partially averted by an early warning system measuring changes in tide. No doubt something that will be considered after the full measure of this tragedy is weighed. Relief agencies are on the move, including World Vision, who is known for its efficiency in reaching such areas. HT: Hugh Hewitt.

Other sad news came last evening about the untimely death of Reggie White, the Minister of Defense, at the very young age of 43. White was instrumental in Superbowl XXXI in January 1997, when he received a record number of sacks against my beloved New England Patriots.

But Reggie will be remembered mostly for his piety and his service to a risen Lord. The following is a remembrance by Joe Theismann:

I knew Reggie White for many years during and after his playing career and I was fortunate to know and spend time with such an amazing human being. The last time I spent time with him was last year during a trip to Indianapolis and I only wish I'd spent more time with him because he was one of the dearest souls to ever put on a uniform. He was committed and outspoken in his beliefs, feared nothing and his commitment to God was No. 1 in his life.

I'll never forget his last season in Green Bay when I was broadcasting a game for Sunday Night Football. He'd torn his hamstring and I remember in the meeting I actually put my fingers in his leg where the hamstring was supposed to be. I expressed shock that he'd be able to play and he told me he put his faith in God that it'd be alright. He went out and had a great game and it was one of the greatest sights I've ever seen. His play that day convinced me of divine intervention. That was typical of the type of faith that Reggie White had. He knew God would take care of the situation.

On the football field, White was a rare combination of size, power and speed. He was one of those guys who stepped up and made special plays when his team needed him to come through. Like all great players he had a great sense of knowing when to seize the moment. That sense of the moment and greatness extended off the field as witnessed by those in his church's congregation. In 1999 White came to the rescue when an arsonist burned down his church. He knew his congregation needed him and he came through leading the fund raising drive to get the church rebuilt. That's his legacy.

It's a tragedy to lose someone so valuable to society at such a young age. I won't remember the passing of Reggie White, but I will remember his contributions and I'll celebrate his life because I had a chance to know the man.

No doubt, God needed a sturdy pair of swift hands. He will be sorely missed.

But, an issue that continues to apply its weight, subtly, behind the scenes, is the role of AP photographers in Iraq and other areas of the world hostile to the US. I think the story, originally flagged by wrethard of The Belmont Club, of AP photographers working on the inside with the enemy is about to blow up as a major news item once the MSM decides to shine its klieg lights on itself, but if they don't, the blogs will continue to shine the light on them.

An AP Director of Photography has been attempting a defense of the behavior of these so-called imbedded AP photographers, but I think they made (and are making) a big mistake in the way they are covering the war.

It is a topic we will monitor.

For Senescent Man Blog Contributors: What Bloggers can learn from Journalists.

Also: What Journalists can learn from Bloggers.

Also, Hugh Hewitt's new book on blogging: Blog: Understanding the Information Reformation that is Changing Your World

From Flannery O'Connor, "The Violent Bear It Away":

God told the world he was going to send it a king and the world waited. The world thought, a golden fleece will do for His bed. Silver and gold and peacock tails, a thousand suns in a peacock's tail will do for his crib. His mother will ride on a four-horned white beast and use the sunset for a cape. She'll trail it behind her over the ground and let the world pull it to pieces, a new one every evening.

Jesus came on cold straw, Jesus was warmed by the breath of an ox. "Who is this?" the world said. "Who is this blue-cold child and this woman, plain as the winter? Is this the Word of God, this blue-cold child? Is this His will, this plain winter-woman?" The world said, "Love cuts like the cold wind and the will of God is plain as the winter."

Hat Tip: Evangelical Outpost and World

For those who have never read it, The Wall Street Journal publishes an outstanding piece by the late Vermont Royster which should be made manditory reading in every school in America this time of year.

Unfortunately, it requires a paid subscription to the newspaper, and can be accessed here for those who have paid subscriptions. One would hope that one day the WSJ will include this in the excellent free Opinion Journal online that they also produce.

But to whet the appetite, below, an excerpt:

When Saul of Tarsus set out on his journey to Damascus the whole of the known world lay in bondage. There was one state, and it was Rome. There was one master for it all, and he was Tiberius Caesar.

Everywhere there was civil order, for the arm of the Roman law was long. Everywhere there was stability, in government and in society, for the centurions saw that it was so.

But everywhere there was something else, too. There was oppression -- for those who were not the friends of Tiberius Caesar...

...There was the persecution of men who dared think differently, who heard strange voices or read strange manuscripts. There was enslavement of men whose tribes came not from Rome, disdain for those who did not have the familiar visage. And most of all, there was everywhere a contempt for human life. What, to the strong, was one man more or less in a crowded world?

Then, of a sudden, there was a light in the world, and a man from Galilee saying, Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's....

Gives one goosebumps. It's worth the subscription to read the whole thing.

Continuing in the vein of our rant on the appropriate way to greet people this time of year, the sentimental senescent one offers this from R. Emmett Tyrrell:

Krauthammer has informed us in his column that it is acceptable to greet the majority of Americans with a cheerful, "Merry Christmas." Well, I am relieved. Next year I may screw my courage to the sticking point and offer "Merry Christmas" to all.

Though to my Jewish friends I would like to offer "Happy Hanukkah." And to my atheist and agnostic friends, "Have a Good One." Actually, I guess I could offer that last greeting to the guy down at the end of the bar whatever his faith, or should I say his/her faith?

It's worth reading the whole thing here.

Fellow RI Blogger, Justin Katz, of Anchor Rising, is promo'd on the latest cover of National Review. Check out the upper left corner (above). Hat tip, RI blogger Dust in the Light.

Posted by The Senescent Man

The Republicans in Washington state purportedly have a plan to solicit support from voters who claim they voted for Dino Rossi but believe their ballots were erroneously rejected. So far, 91 of such voters from Washington have come forward. The bureaucrats are giving them a hassle.

But, more importantly, Republicans in Washington should now pursue the counting of votes from GI's overseas who's absentee ballots were sent too late for their votes to be considered. An absolute travesty.

But since the election has not been certified yet, the law allows them to be included, thanks, in part, to this long delay to certify due to the historic closeness of this gubernatorial race.

Go for it guys. Let's get Rossi in certified as governor. After hearing that Gregoire urged Rossi to "abide by the results of the recount" after her NOT abiding by the previous three recounts, I can see the best thing that could happen in Washington state is for the Republicans to keep the pressure on.

Hat tip to The Corner and Stranded on Blue Islands whom we just added to our Blogroll.

The Belmont Club has done it again. They may have uncovered the next BIG thing in the blogosphere regarding the MSM, possibly topping the CBS-Rather scandal IMHO. There is a growing suspicion that some AP photographers are in on the pre-terrorism actions and planning by the enemy. Read it all here.

Newsweek's Anna Quindlen reminds us that Christian observances of Christmas are, well, best accomplished in the privacy of our little homesteads:

Christmas is being observed exactly where it ought to be, at homes...[i.e., stay out of the public square and get out of my face.]

But more importantly,...

From the trials of witches in Salem to the talking-head evangelists of the present day, we have a rich tradition of faith-based bullying in this country.

I don't know about you, but the MSM has been pretty bullyish to me on this and other issues, up to this point. I guess bullies don't like to get a taste of their own medicine prescribed by the blogosphere.

At least Newsweek, on the whole, is being consistent. They simply, just don't get it.

Excellent post this morning by wretchard of the Belmont Club blog concerning an eye witness account of the attack in Mosul which killed 20 Americans.

The latest news is that Democrats in Washington state are claiming victory with an 8 vote lead over Dino Rossi after the fourth, (manual) recount, and have asked Rossi to concede.

This is reminiscent of the Three Stooges routine where Moe yells at Curley: "He's up. He's down. He's up. He's down," ending with a sock to the kisser. And that is exactly what Republicans received this morning. Only it's not funny.

Some might think it would be ridiculous for Rossi to concede having won in the previous three counts, and having lost in this recount with only 8 votes. But I think it would be a huge blow to Democrats for Rossi to graciously concede, and immediately upon this news, demonstrating a stark contrast in a philosophy of life, and to cause Washington staters to ponder, "Did the Democrats really win the gubernatorial race fair and square?"

The next election would be a doozy, in this senescent man's view.

I don't think there is a "war" going on, per se, against all things Christian in this country, at least not yet, though there are rumbles and flashes on the horizon. I do think, though, that there is a general misunderstanding of Christianity, and also a general disrespect for Christianity and all things "Christian" by many in the MSM.

I also think it is shameful that many plain folk find themselves embarrassed or, worse, persecuted for merely uttering "Merry Christmas," in secular company. But, Hugh Hewitt continues to - appropriately - stoke the machinery on the subject. He points to an excellent piece today by "Deacon" from Time Magazine's "Blog of the Year" Power Line. Herewith a brief excerpt:

...there is nothing contradictory about arguing that President Bush won a clear but narrow victory in part because his voters supported traditional Christian values, while at the same time recognizing that those values, along with Christianity, are under serious attack.

I recommend that you read the whole thing.

Excellent piece by Brendan Miniter on Opinion Journal. An excerpt:

The most surprising thing an American military officer told me about his work in Iraq came in a statement he later asked to retract. And it strikes me as something worth thinking about in this Christmas season as we go through the annual ritual of pulling crèche scenes from courthouse lawns across America. In the debate over faith in the public square there is rarely an acknowledgement that there is a link between morality and government.

After describing the good works his men were doing by rebuilding schools and providing food and medicine to Iraqis, the officer summed up this list by saying "We're just doing the Lord's work." At the time the comment seemed perfectly appropriate. I do not know the officer's faith or even if he is a Christian. But his meaning was clear: His men were performing vital humanitarian work in addition to taking on insurgents. The surprise came a few minutes after the interview, when a public information officer asked to retract the comment. Apparently in the post-interview debriefing someone got scared that it could be misconstrued. The officer did not mean to imply that he was doing the Lord's work at all, I was assured.

But that is exactly what he meant and exactly what he is doing.

Oh I know, some readers get all funky when they hear the words "God" or "Lord" in a political blog, especially my libertarian friends. To them I say, "Fear Not." After all, it's Christmas, isn't it? But I strongly implore you to read the whole thing here and make your own choice.

Sound Politics reports that:

The Rossi campaign has just released the results of an Elway poll which shows that the state's voters believe:

1) If Rossi prevails in the manual recount, he should be accepted as the legitimate Governor.

2) If Gregoire increases her margin in King County as a result of changing the rules in the middle of the game, that her "win" will not be accepted as legitimate and that a run-off election should be held.

This in spite of the fact that the survey sample included significantly more Democrats than Republicans and an equal number who said they voted for each candidate.

The complete report is available on our new offsite library called Oblogatory Reading.

The Weekly Standard has a piece on Maryland Governor Ehrlich's war with the Baltimore Sun. An Excerpt:

"When a series of stories is written with incredibly inaccurate innuendo, with false quotes, made-up quotes, dots that do not connect, gotcha stories, sometimes you just have to draw a line. And that's exactly what we've done here, saying enough is enough."

The Hedgehog Report is also covering this story. I would think that Republican governors have more to work with these days when confronting liberal media monopolies like the Sun due to the Blogosphere.

The Belmont Club ponders how the AP obtained the execution photographs of the Iraqi election officials. Hat tip: Instapundit.

From today's (Monday's) Opinion Journal, the results of a recent poll in Iraq concerning their future:

What will you base your vote on?

Political agenda - 65%
Factional origin - 14%
Party Affiliation - 4%
National Background - 12%
Other reasons - 5%

Do you support dialog with the deposed Baathists?

Yes - 15%
No - 84%
Do not know - 1%

Do you support postponing the election?

Yes - 18%
No - 80%
Do not know - 2%

Do you think the elections will take place as scheduled?

Yes - 83%
No - 13%
Do not know - 4%

The poll was taken of 5,000 people in and around Baghdad, giving the poll an accuracy of +/- 1.5%.

Also, a message to the Iraqi people from Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai:

"They must go to polls. They must take this opportunity, elect their people to parliament, and have a government of their own, and have peace. . . . The major lesson in Afghanistan was that the Afghan people wanted change, from the tyranny of terrorism. The Iraqi people also will gain nothing if they allow these people to come from outside and destroy their lives."

Courtesy: Time
Posted by The Senescent Man

For what it is worth, George W. (above) is Time Magazine's Person (Man) of the Year.

Powerline Blog, one of our "exceptional blogs" listed in the sidebar to the right, was also named by Time as "Blog of the Year." This being, the Year of the Blog, that would make it quite an honor, and we agree well deserved. Bravo Powerline!

Unfortunately, The Senescent Man did not make it this time around. Better luck in 2005.

The MSM, and in particular, NEWSWEEK, is at it again. Not satisfied with the mere, usual denigration of Christmas, which was the topic of Vox Blogoli VI (via Hugh Hewitt), NEWSWEEK decided it needed to stoop to an even lower low with this insipid and one-sided interview with Franklin Graham, son of Evangelist Billy Graham, and president of Samaritan's Purse, a nondenominational evangelical Christian program founded in 1970 that serves the poor, refugees and others at home and abroad. He recently spoke with NEWSWEEK about his work in Iraq, gay marriage and the role of evangelism.

Below are some excerpts from the interview conducted by NEWSWEEK's Brian Braiker, but I’ve taken the vulgar liberty to respond myself; so although the responses from The Senescent Man are NOT published in NEWSWEEK, they are here, unfortunately, in this exclusive for your media entertainment pleasure -- after all, it is ONLY entertainment, isn't it? It most definitely is NOT news:

NEWSWEEK: Do you think that the media and entertainment industry is not reflective of the religious values people say they have? Twenty-two percent of voters put moral values as their top concern in this election yet “Desperate Housewives” is a hot show. Do you see any disconnect there?

Franklin Graham: …No question: there is a disconnect with the entertainment industry and the values of America.

The Senescent Man: What kind of stupid question is that? Of course the MSM is out of whack with the rest of the world. Where have you been?!?!

NEWSWEEK: The president seemed to signal that he was OK with civil unions in the last weeks of the campaign. Is your objection to marriage as a word?

Franklin Graham: This was an issue that I think in this election where people finally said, “I’ve had it. I don’t want that agenda being forced and pushed and mandated on me.” You can’t legislate morality. A homosexual’s sins are no different than a heterosexual’s sins. If I go out tonight and I sleep with someone who’s not my wife, it’s just as great a sin as gay people [having sex]. Sin is sin.

The Senescent Man: First of all, the President is opposed to gay marriage, get that straight. As to the second question in this question, no, it is not merely a word. If there is a word I do object to it is NEWSWEEK.

NEWSWEEK: Some people have said that the evangelical community has a disproportionate amount of interest about what goes on people’s sex lives as opposed to spending more time fighting poverty, healing the sick, feeding the hungry and trying to do more that is in line with Jesus’ teachings.

Franklin Graham: I don’t have an interest in what goes on in other people’s bedrooms. I think it’s a fascination by the media….

The Senescent Man: Indeed, I am interested in what goes on in EVERY bedroom in America. What’s happening tonight in yours? Nothing, I presume. What kind of stupid question is that?

NEWSWEEK: How do you respond to critics you say your work [in Iraq] has convinced already skeptical Arabs that you’re out to convert Muslims?

Franklin Graham: We don’t want to make anyone a Christian. We were there at the invitation of the churches of Iraq who said “We need your help. Some of our neighborhoods are blown up; our hospitals are not working.” The first thing we did was go in and help a couple of the large hospitals open up some clinics. These were not Christian hospitals or Christian clinics. These were just government-run facilities run by Muslims that needed intensive-care units, needed operating rooms….

The Senescent Man: Don't let the Door hit you on the way out.

NEWSWEEK: It hasn’t helped having the more mediagenic leaders—Oral Roberts, Jerry Falwell, you yourself—making inflammatory comments about Islam.

Franklin Graham: The problem with our country is that we do not understand Islam. We still don’t. You get into Islamic countries, there is no separation between the government and between the religion. Islamic law, like in Saudi Arabia, is the law of the land. It’s not a secular law, it’s a religious law based on the religious faith. It’s a strange concept for us, to live under a religious law. Religion and government is one and the same [in Islamic countries]. As far as the teaching and faith of the people, I think since 9/11 there has been a strong debate in America over Islam. There are millions of Muslims in this country who have fled Islamic law; they have fled Islamic law but they have kept their faith but they want to live in peace. They want the American dream and they have every right to it. We as a nation, our values system is based on a whole different set of principles.

The Senescent Man: It hasn’t helped having nincompoops like you asking really dumb and inflammatory questions like this one. It is no wonder the MSM’s days are numbered.

NEWSWEEK: You were quoted a couple years ago as calling Islam an “evil and wicked religion.” Would you care to revisit that comment?

Franklin Graham: Those comments started a debate in this country. I don’t know what I can add to it. I respect the people of the Islamic faith that have come to this country. I have Muslim friends. But that doesn’t stop me from wanting to help them. That doesn’t stop me from loving them. I certainly don’t believe the way they believe, and they don’t believe the way I believe, either. That doesn’t make me dislike them, and I love them very much. I want to do all I can to help them. In Khartoum, we have been working for years in a mission in the south. I want to demonstrate to those Muslims that my love for them is sincere. I want them to know about God’s son, Jesus Christ. I want them to know but I certainly don’t want to force it on them. I would like some day for Muslims to know what Christians do.

The Senescent Man: If you don’t mind my asking a question with a question, what did you think of the religion of David Koresh? Or Sun Myung Moon? Or the Jehovah’s Witnesses. I’ll bet you’re not a big fan of any of them. Hey, everyone has their pet peeves about the multitude of “religions” out there, including NEWSWEEK.

NEWSWEEK: Do you support a constitutional ban on gay marriage?

Franklin Graham: Under normal circumstances, no. But the way judges are rewriting laws. I don’t know how else you can stop them.

The Senescent Man: Yes.

NEWSWEEK: Was Brown v. Board of Education a case of activist judges making their own law?

Franklin Graham: I don’t know; I’m not familiar with it…. But I do believe that the majority of people, people of Christian faith, are under attack. No question about it.

The Senescent Man: What kind of stupid question is that? How about Roe v. Wade? Graham is not a politician, but obviously you are. Let me formulate a similar question a la fallacy of “complex question:” Did you consider Bill Clinton a moral president despite his lurid affair with Monica Lewinsky? Keep it up NEWSWEEK, this kind of garbage won’t last too long.

You can read the whole, real interview here.

Dino Rossi may have gotten a little good news this evening, possibly putting him permanently ahead of the Lady in Red.

From Sound Politics:

A judge in Pierce County Superior Court has ruled that the 723 disputed ballots in King County, Wash., should not be included in the ballot recount for Washington state governor.

From AP:

TACOMA, Wash. -- A judge Friday granted a state Republican Party request to block the counting of hundreds of recently discovered King County ballots in Washington's incredibly close governor's race.

Pierce County Superior Court Judge Stephanie Arend's decision hinged on whether it was simply too late for counties to reconsider ballots from the November election, even if such ballots were erroneously rejected by election workers.

From reading state law and state Supreme Court decisions, "it is clear to me that it is not appropriate to go back and revisit decisions on whether ballots should or should not be counted," Arend said.

No doubt the Democrats will contest this in court. And you know that notion,...

From James Lileks through Instapundit:

Maybe it's just me. Perhaps I'm overly sensitive. But when I wish a store clerk "Merry Christmas!" they often appear stunned and flummoxed for a moment, as if I've just blabbed the plans for the underground's sabotage of the train tracks in front of the secret police. I've said something highly inappropriate for the public square, and I almost expect a security guard to take me aside on the way out. He'll lead me to a small room. He has no enthusiasm for this; it's the end of his shift, and he's done this a dozen times already today. But policy is policy....

I don't get it. There's this peculiar fear of Christmas that seems to get stronger every year, as if it's the season that dare not speak its name. Check out the U.S. Postal Service Web site: two different stamps for Kwanzaa. One for Eid, two for Hanukkah. Two for non-sectarian "Holiday," with pictures of Santa, reindeer, ornaments, that sort of thing. One for the Chinese New Year. One for those religiously inclined -- it features a Madonna and Child. But the Web site calls it "Holiday Traditional." The word "Christmas" doesn't appear on the site's description of the stamps. Eid, yes. Hanukkah, yes. Kwanzaa, yes. Christmas? No. It's Holiday Traditional....

Somewat in tune with the post by Steve Graham below regarding Krauthammer's observations. Read the whole thing here.

What the Battle of the Bulge would look like through the lens of the 21st Century MSM (hat tip Hugh Hewitt):

December 17th, 1944

PARIS (Routers) Long-time critics of the Roosevelt administration declared themselves vindicated today, as the Germans began a renewed offensive yesterday in the Ardennes Forest in Belgium, opening a huge hole in the "Allied" lines and throwing back troops for miles, with previously unimaginable US casualties.

Read the whole thing here.

Charles Krauthammer (who is Jewish), today talks about the loss of Christmas and the extremism surrounding the practice of Christmas parties, decorations, caroling, etc. From his article:

The attempts to de-Christianize Christmas are as absurd as they are relentless. The United States today is the most tolerant and diverse society in history. It celebrates all faiths with an open heart and open-mindedness that, compared to even the most advanced countries in Europe, are unique.

Yet more than 80 percent of Americans are Christian, and probably 95 percent of Americans celebrate Christmas. Christmas Day is an official federal holiday, the only day of the entire year when, for example, the Smithsonian museums are closed. Are we to pretend that Christmas is nothing but an orgy of commerce in celebration of . . . what? The winter solstice?

I may agree that the US is the most tolerant society in history - except when it comes to christain religous expression at Christmas time. Read the whole story here.

The Rossi - Gregoire race in Washington state is getting hairier and hairier. Here's an up to the minute update from Sound Politics:

The Washington State Republican Party says that the Ukraine County Democrats are changing the rules:

This morning the King County Elections Department announced to ballot counters that it is changing the rules it had previously set on counting votes. King County’s established guidelines had said that if there were marks in the bubbles for both Rossi and Gregoire, the vote would be considered an “over vote” and would not be counted because the voter had voted for both candidates. Now, however, the Elections Department is going to send these ballots to the Democrat-dominated canvassing board for review.

The WSRP release links to a graphic from the Ukraine County elections training manual that illustrates what an overvote is. Nevertheless, the plain standards in the manual are being thrown out the window in favor of the "human judgment" of Ukraine County's Democrat-dominated canvassing board. State GOP chairman Chris Vance wonders whether the Democrats might be changing the rules now because Rossi appeared to be gaining in the recount....

...[And the] explanation for the 573 magical mystery ballots[?] Please put down your beverage.

1) These are all validly registered voters.

2) For some reason, and Logan could not say what that reason is, these validly registered voters' signatures were not in the computer database where the signatures are supposed to be kept. But he believes their original signatures would be in the paper files.

3) About 100 of these voters were sent letters informing them that their signatures were not up-to-date in the database, asking them to update their signatures. However, there were not supposed to be any consequences for a voter who failed to update their signature. The letters were sent only to "expedite the process" and prevent the county workers from having to look for the voters' signatures in the paper files.

4) Even if such a voter failed to update their signature, they were sent a ballot anyway, without ever being told (until six weeks after the election, and only then by serendipity) that their ballot would not be accepted because the database did not contain their signature.

Got it?

It makes you wonder what other idiotic procedures they have in place, and what other errors they're making and not discovering, or discovering and not reporting.

The Senescent poll monitor will keep you posted,...

The Washington Post has reported that an additional 561 votes have been "found" in one of the more highly Democrat districts in Washington state, threatening Dino Rossi's paper thin lead over Christine Gregoire. Sound Politics reports that the number is up now, from 561 to 595. Statistically, this could move the lead to Gregoire by 195 votes. At the moment, though, in this third round of recounds, Dino is by 85. Stay tuned.

In 1987, Professor Allan Bloom, a member of the Committee for Social Thought at the University of Chicago, began his prescient treatise The Closing of the American Mind with the following observation:

There is one thing a professor can be absolutely certain of: almost every student entering the university believes, or says he believes, that truth is relative.

Bloom said this about his young students, but he was equally critical of the educators who promulgated relativistic thinking. Likewise, Professor and Christian author R. C. Sproul has complained that modern education has abandoned truth and replaced it with rhetoric. “Educators,” he said, “have become modern-day Sophists.” And likewise, those whom the educators have attempted to educate.

Bloom’s observations were made over fifteen years ago. Today, many of those 18 to 22 year-old students, are now 35 to 40, and are serving at managerial levels on the editorial boards of the MSM. Therefore, a reason magazines like Newsweek tend to be critical of the historicity of Christ’s birth, and the Gospel accounts, is that the story flies directly in the face of moral and historical relativism.

MSM skepticism of the story of Christmas is also based upon a tenacious foolhardiness towards anything of a “super nature.” In an obituary of the beloved, brilliant, amusing, talented, conservative, though gay and agnostic Boston radio talk show host, David Brudnoy, about which I have posted a couple of times since his death, Boston Herald columnist Jeff Jacoby makes this observation:

…One day, driving our rented Fiat from Bergamo back to Milan, we [Jacoby and Brudnoy] talked at length about religion -- in particular, about the afterlife that he doubted was real. "Just wait," I told him. "One of these days you'll find out it's as real as Milan. And what will you do then?" That day came far sooner than any of us wanted,…

One hopes that David Brudnoy, before the end, followed in the leap of faith made by C. S. Lewis, A. W. Tozer, J. R. R. Tolkien, John R. W. Stott and others of equivalent gravitas. They determined that a super nature can be a legitimate component of reality. But many brilliant writers of the MSM, refuse to even consider the proposition and instead mock those who consider such things real as dull, uneducated or anti-intellectual.

For the MSM, anything believing in the supernatural is lumped together, particularly if there is a sober seriousness attached. Therefore “fundamentalist” Islam is sometimes made tantamount to Christian fundamentalism, and that, in turn, is inexorably linked to evangelicalism. So the reasoning of the MSM is that the sagacious Chuck Colson is equivalent to an Ayman Al-Zawahri.

A final thought as to reasons the MSM naysay the nativity is their unending and passionate desire to act as the official debunkers of everything underpinning Christian faith and heritage. This may be partly rooted in skepticism of a super nature, but is also founded upon a strong desire to publicly ridicule those who have faith and conviction. “Let’s guffaw at those kooky Christian nut-balls,” is the underlying attitude.

The free market of thought, prevalent in the blogosphere today but not in the MSM, will one day significantly change the way people get their information. When that day comes, and it will be soon, it will forever change the way the MSM operates. The blogosphere will rock their world. The revolution WILL be audioblogged, vlogged as well as blogged.

The Corner tipped us to the efforts of Blogger Pieter Dorsman, who is translating some of the writings of Theo Van Gogh on his blog entitled Peaktalk.   You may recall that Van Gogh was slain by Islamic militant(s) because of his opinions about the oppression of radical Islamic fundamentalists in Holland.  The Corner captured the essence with this excerpt from the translations:

“The dead poor sheep farmers on Sicily at the turn of the century argued that America must be heaven on earth as emigrated family members relayed messages of having meat for dinner everyday. That was a mouthwatering experience for people who could enjoy that privilege maybe once in a lifetime. You can argue that particular instinct to be ‘ordinary’ or ‘superficial’ like so many do here, but it is way beyond me to look down on it. America is hated because it embodies the hope of people that yearn for a better life, to have meat everyday, but also to believe in the God they choose, or not. To say what you want without being persecuted. To be a woman without a veil, with the right to vote, free expression and adultery, without being stoned."

 

// posted by The Senescent Man @ 8:38 PM 0 Comments

Shortly after our post on David Brudnoy, we received a very kind acknowledgement from Marc Marc Comtois at The Ocean State Blogger. Today, Town Hall posted a piece by Boston Herald columnist Jeff Jacoby on his relationship with Brudnoy over the years. It is a very fine piece, and you can read the whole thing here.

Here are some excerpts:

In the spring of 1983, about a year after we'd first met, David Brudnoy took me to lunch. Most of what we spoke about that day, I have long since forgotten. But two things he said still stick in my mind.

One was a comment about wine, a topic about which I knew -- and still know -- next to nothing. Most white wines are drinkable, Brudnoy told me, but rarely do you encounter a *great* white wine. The really spectacular wines, he went on, are almost always red -- but, alas, most red wines are dreadful...

...Yes, ideology mattered.

But friendship mattered more. And what a talent he had for it! Brudnoy's pals were legion -- young and old, white and black, gay and straight, Republican and Democrat. I don't know how I came to deserve membership in that fraternity, but I know I didn't earn it for my politics....

...So many things delighted him, not least of which was his own sense of humor. In 2001 I wrote a column marking Brudnoy's 25th anniversary as a Boston talk show host, and he merrily shared it with his e-mail list.

"So Jeff couldn't think of anything nice to say about me?" the covering message read. "After all I've done for him -- officiated at his wedding, circumcised Caleb, took him to his first all-nude gay revival, taught him Tokugawa-era classical Japanese haiku, washed his car every Saturday, took him shopping in Milan for Gucci suits, got him into Skull and Bones -- and still he can't say a kind word about me. Jeez!"

Actually, the Milan reference was accurate. We really did travel there some years ago, and spent a week exploring northern Italy by car. One day, driving our rented Fiat from Bergamo back to Milan, we talked at length about religion -- in particular, about the afterlife that he doubted was real.

"Just wait," I told him. "One of these days you'll find out it's as real as Milan. And what will you do then?"

That day came far sooner than any of us wanted, but there can't be much doubt about what David Brudnoy is doing now. He is making friends, stimulating conversation, spreading cheer -- and doing it all with the gallantry and grace that none of us who knew him is ever going to forget.

John Fund has an excellent piece in today’s (Monday’s) WSJ Opinion Journal regarding the effect of Blogs on the close South Dakota US Senate race which ended with John Thune defeating incumbent Tom Daschle.

An excerpt:

Bloggers received a lot of attention for helping to expose the fake documents backing up Dan Rather's "60 Minutes" story on President Bush and the Texas Air National Guard. But that's only one of the interesting ways in which the Internet is empowering people and shaping political coverage.

Indeed, the real power of bloggers in politics is how they interact with their mainstream media counterparts. Online journalism gives critics of the media a way to talk back, a platform from which to point out bias, hypocrisy and factual errors. And if the criticisms are on target, old-media institutions can't help but take note. That's exactly what just happened in South Dakota's epic Senate race between Minority Leader Tom Daschle and his GOP challenger, John Thune.

Read the rest of it here.

I hope Democrats really DO follow Dean’s advice, given today on NBC’s Meet the Press…

 

In his own words:

MR. RUSSERT:  The New Republic has written an editorial opposed to your candidacy.  It says, "This is one of those key moments when Democrats must decide what course to take in the wake of 2004 election.  And making Dean their spokesman is exactly the wrong way to go.  ... During the campaign, Dean embraced a particular, and utterly wrong, theory of how Democrats ought to win elections.  Rather than focus on persuading centrists, he argued, Democrats should rile up their own base, which required the nomination of Dean rather than a more cautious new Democrat.  `I concluded that the only way we can win is to really get our base excited:  African Americans, Latinos, trade unionists, women and new young people.'  ... This, too, proved false.  ... The liberal base is simply not large enough to win national elections."

DR. DEAN:  First of all, I don't think we're talking about a liberal base.  I think we're talking about a populist base [OOOooooohhhhhh!], a base that wants economic justice, a base that wants fairness, a base that knows it's been left behind by a president who is much more interested in corporate welfare than he is of the welfare of the American public at large.

Second of all, our campaign didn't fail because I was wrong about the strategy.  Karl Rove has used the strategy that the New Republic talked about incredibly successful.  You didn't see the president becoming a centrist all of a sudden.  The president is the most conservative really far-right president we've seen in my lifetime and he uses that very effectively to get his base to the polls.

I get it.  And I say, GO FOR IT HOWARD!

// posted by The Senescent Man @ 8:18 PM 0 Comments

 

And here is just one reason why.  Read this excellent piece by Ben from The American Spectator.

 

A preview:

 

A few days ago, a package arrived in the mail from the widow of my late father-in-law, Colonel Dale Denman, Jr., of Heber Springs, Arkansas. I opened it and there was a leather holster and inside it, a German Luger pistol….

 

…I know there are a lot of these Lugers around. You can buy them at antique gun shops and gun shows. But this one is special to me. Here is what it says:

My brave father-in-law, representative of tens of millions of American men and women who have gone off to fight for freedom, fought against cruel, tenacious enemies. They often lost their lives in so doing. They prevailed and I get to live in spectacular freedom, glorious, bright freedom, every day because men like Col. Denman were as brave as they were.

 

I had a father-in-law who was likewise one of these brave men from the greatest generation.  I agree with Ben.  We can thank them for the freedom we enjoy today, and we can thank our young men and women in Iraq for the terrorism-free future we and our children will enjoy going forward.  I remember a remark by Zell Miller at the Republican National Convention earlier this year.  He said in his keynote address something to the effect that he had looked into the eyes of his children and realized that, though he was a Democrat, for their sakes and the sakes of his grandchildren, he needed to support a president who was going to secure their future.  It is nice to know we’re not alone in this view.

 

The whole thing by Ben Stein is here.

// posted by The Senescent Man @ 1:53 PM 0 Comments

 

This is from a post in Slate by Bing West, author and former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs during the Reagan administration, which highlights just what it was we were fighting for in Fallujah, and what a tremendous success it was.  It stands as one of only a few bits from a MSM source (sort of) that hits it dead straight.  An excerpt:

 

Politically, Fallujah was as infected as the air at the torture house at the corner of the park. Many of the residents were complicit in the reign of terror. Whether the city returns to its murderous ways depends on the resolve of the Iraqi security forces now moving into the city. Voter turnout in January will be an indictor of how the political winds are blowing.

 

Militarily, the battle of Fallujah was an unqualified success. Zarqawi has been deprived of his sanctuary. He will spend more time on the run and have less time to blow up and decapitate people. His followers have been hit hard, many killed and others uprooted. Just today, an Egyptian, a Yemenite, and a Sudanese crawled out from the rubble and surrendered…

 

…After lynching … Americans on the Euphrates bridge [prior to the US invasion], the [Islamic] fundamentalists painted an Arabic verse on the right trestle. It read:

 

“Fallujah—Graveyard of the American Marine Corps.”

 

On the left trestle, in thick black paint a Marine had scrawled a newer inscription. It read:

 

"This is for the Americans of Blackwater

murdered here in 2004.

Semper Fidelis,  3/5  Dark Horse"

 

You can read the whole thing here.

 

// posted by The Senescent Man @ 1:07 PM 0 Comments

This one has a circuitous thread, but is worth following:

Roger L. Simon has a piece pertaining to a quandary liberals find themselves in relative to supporting or opposing the War on Terror.

He cites a piece by Jonah Goldberg of NRO thrashing Kevin Drum's arguments regarding the War on Terror. According to Simon the post is:

about Peter Beinart piece [in the New Republic] urging liberals to take a harder line on Islamofascism in the manner many did on Communism back in the forties and fifties. Drum seems to have been peeved by Beinart's suggestion, making the risible statement that Peter ought first to prove that Islamic totalitarianism was "an overwhelming danger to the security of the United States." (Well, I guess we can't expect Kevin to lead the charge hereabouts for Theo Van Gogh - poor guy was Dutch.)

The Democrats have a serious problem. If they continue to have this kind of division over the War on Terror, they may not see a majority in Congress or a Presidency for decades.

Sound Politics once again has an update on the Rossi / Gregoire slugfest that has been going on in Washington state since November 2nd.

As you may recall, Rossi won in a very close race, then won again in a recount, but only by 42 votes. Now as the manual count progresses, Rossi appears to be showing signs of a solid advantage.

But, Sound Politics admonishes:

Of course, this number will be revised (and can change significantly) as new information becomes available. A Supreme Court order to change the way that the recount is conducted could change [Rossi's advantage] by quite a lot. In the meantime, if you are a Democrat who is contemplating a job in the Gregoire administration, but you have another job offer that you have to decide on by today, you might not want to forfeit a 100% sure thing for a 20% long shot.

Read the whole thing here.

From CBS this evening (Friday):

Internet blogs are providing a new and unregulated medium for politically motivated attacks. With the same First Amendment protections as newspapers, blogs are increasingly gaining influence.

Heavens forefend! The same rights as newspapers! What is the world coming too?

While many are must-reads for political junkies, are some Internet blogs also being used as proxies for campaigns? In the nation’s hottest Senate race [Thune versus Daschle in South Dakota], this past year, the answer was yes....

...The two leading South Dakota blogs – websites full of informal analysis, opinions and links – were authored by paid advisers to Thune’s campaign.

Oh my gosh! And this was not true for Democrats? Are we just continuing the whine of sour grapes of the close race against Daschle? Are we upset that there is an emergence of freelance blogs, many of the best on the web coming from the right parallax view?

The Senescent Man will admit that the anarchic medium of blogs may be rife with flaws, but in the same way the miracle of the free market tends to be self cleansing, the blogosphere is likewise subject the self evaluation and self correction. The frauds will ultimately be exposed. But what's revolutionary about this medium is that what at one time had been accepted as gospel from the MSM (CBS being a prime example), is now scrutinized by an army of thousands.

Long may it reign.

Before there was Andrew Sullivan, there was David Brudnoy.

And even before he was a regular talk show host on WBZ in Boston, and before that on WRKO (1981), and before that, WHDH (1976), Dr. David Brudnoy was a professor of history and a regular contributor to National Review. His name has remained on the NR masthead since the early 1970's.

The Senescent Man, who was a not so senescent college student with conservative leanings in 1974, was fortunate to have Brudnoy as a professor for one single semester. We became friends and visited him at his Boston apartment on Beacon Hill, and again at his summer home on Cape Cod with Gary Boden (who is a contributor to this Blog).

We were attracted to him by his terrific writing ability. For example, in a review he had done of some liberal tome for National Review in 1974, he characterized the book as "ennui bathed in banality." Language the Senescent Man could appreciate.

Although we disagreed with his views on “sexual orientation,” (he referred to me derisively as "the Reverend Doctor Nevola") we appreciated his intellect and his right leaning philosophy. We were shocked and saddened when he learned that he had contracted AIDS in the late 1980's / early 1990's. And are now all the more shaken and saddened by the news of his death to cancer, earlier this evening.

He was a "thoughtful and considerate"radio talk show host, a smooth, skilled and learned voice, and a conservative scholar. New England will miss his intellect and his civility. I will miss his friendship.

Conservatives can respectfully disagree, even when we're diagreeable, and such can be the disposition of a crotchety, senescent men. But The Senescent Man is truly surprised, dismayed and confused by a recent post from the Heritage Foundation on Jim Taricani by Mark Tapscott, who is their director of the Center for Media and Public Policy. Tapscott writes:

Consider the case of WJAR-TV reporter Jim Taricani in Providence, R.I. Taricani was convicted Nov. 22 of criminal contempt of court for refusing to disclose a confidential source. The NBC reporter could get up to six months in jail in his Dec. 9 sentencing hearing.

Taricani’s “crime” began more than three years ago when he accepted -- and his station broadcast -- a videotape of a Providence official accepting a bribe from an undercover FBI informant. The videotape came from sealed evidence in an FBI probe that eventually resulted in criminal convictions of prominent Providence officials, including former Mayor Buddy Cianci.

A federal prosecutor demanding to know who leaked the videotape subpoenaed Taricani. A U.S. District Court judge then cited Taricani for contempt and imposed a $1,000-a-day fine when he refused to reveal his source.

After a failed appeal to a higher federal court, the District Court judge stayed the fines -- more than $85,000 paid by NBC -- and gave the reporter two weeks to cough up his source. He again refused and was convicted of criminal contempt....

Proposals for a federal shield law to protect journalists and their confidential sources are likely to be considered by Congress in 2005. There are now shield laws in 31 states and the District of Columbia.

Passage of a federal shield law would backstop the FOIA, while refocusing federal prosecutors and judges on putting criminals in government in jail -- instead of the reporters who expose the bad guys.

The Senescent Man disagrees, and still believes that the right to Due Process trumps this popular and nearly absolute "freedom" of the Press.

Is it possible that the nation is moving more and more to the right simply by sheer numbers? Those reading Dr. Zeuss to their kids, and families with triplets, take note...

From today's (Tuesday's) NY Times, David Brooks writes:

There is a little-known movement sweeping across the United States. The movement is "natalism."

All across the industrialized world, birthrates are falling - in Western Europe, in Canada and in many regions of the United States. People are marrying later and having fewer kids. But spread around this country, and concentrated in certain areas, the natalists defy these trends.

They are having three, four or more kids. Their personal identity is defined by parenthood. They are more spiritually, emotionally and physically invested in their homes than in any other sphere of life, having concluded that parenthood is the most enriching and elevating thing they can do. Very often they have sacrificed pleasures like sophisticated movies, restaurant dining and foreign travel, let alone competitive careers and disposable income, for the sake of their parental calling.

In a world that often makes it hard to raise large families, many are willing to move to find places that are congenial to natalist values. The fastest-growing regions of the country tend to have the highest concentrations of children.

Who knows? Red state parents with large progeny may win the day in the long run. The Senescent Man has two teenagers and a 20 year old (it is the main reason he is crotchety, conservative and, in a word, senescent); the two Senescent daughters were eligible to vote on November 2nd. To The Senescent Man's delight, they both supported George W. Even through we reside in a Blue State.

Read the whole thing here (free online subscription required).

Every couple of weeks, Arthur Chrenkoff of the Wall Street Journal writes an editorial subtitled "A roundup of the past two weeks' good news from Iraq." Today is no exception, and it comes coincidentally to a major news story from CNN.com this evening. The CNN piece is entitled: "Senator: Public needs 'cold, hard facts' on Iraq," subtitled: "A moderate Republican senator who recently returned from Iraq said conditions are worse than last year and the American public needs to hear "the cold, hard facts."

Guess who the "moderate" Republican US Senator is? Yup. None other than The Senescent Man's very own US Senator, Sen. Lincoln Chafee.

First of all, it is kind of amusing that CNN calls him a moderate. If he's a moderate, then the run-of-the-mill Republican Senator must be a right wing extremist. One wonders what they think of truly conservative Republicans in Congress.

But what's especially fascinating is juxtaposing Senator Chafee's newsworthy observations for CNN against Chrenkoff's observations in the WSJ this week:

Chafee:

Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island said the situation he encountered was "frightening at times."

"It's a very tenuous security situation," Chafee told CNN. "I'd been there a year ago -- what a change [for the worse]."

The pilot of the C-130 aircraft was forced to "do some evasive maneuvers," causing some anxious moments, Chafee said.

"We really need cold, hard facts and honesty," Chafee said. "The situation is tough over there." [Meaning what, we're being lied to?]

He said insurgents "pretty much" control Mosul and large parts of Baghdad, as well as the 10-mile stretch of road from the airport into the capital.

"If with 100,000-plus troops over there, we can't control that 10-mile road, it shows what's happening politically," the senator said. "The people are not as friendly as they were a year ago towards Americans."

Chrenkoff:

[A] Chaldean Archbishop [from] Kirkuk, is a very frustrated man these days. "It is not all death and destruction," says the archbishop. "Much is positive in Iraq today. . . . Universities are operating, schools are open, people go out onto the streets normally. . . . Where there's a kidnapping or a homicide the news gets out immediately, and this causes fear among the people. . . . Those who commit such violence are resisting against Iraqis who want to build their country."

[The Archbishop continues:] "Western newspapers [moderate US Senators] and broadcasters are simply peddling propaganda and misinformation. . . . Iraqis are happy to be having elections and are looking forward to them because they will be useful for national unity. . . . Perhaps not everything will go exactly to plan, but, with time, things will improve. Finally Iraqis will be given the chance to choose. Why is there so much noise and debate coming out from the West when before, under Saddam, there were no free elections, but no one said a thing?"

[The Archbishop's] frustration is increasingly shared by other Iraqis, who can hardly recognize their country from the foreign media coverage [like CNN]. Westerners, too, both military and civilian, upon their return are often finding to their surprise and concern they had lived and worked in a different country to that their loved ones, friends and neighbors back home saw every night on the news. "Our" Iraq is a place of violence, uncertainty, and frustration; "their" Iraq is all that, but also so much more: work and renewal, hope and enthusiasm, new opportunities and new possibilities.

The CNN piece on Chafee's report is here. The WSJ article is here. You can decide whose perspective is more correct. Please feel free to comment.

One wonders just what "cold, hard facts" Chafee could possibly be jabbering about? The so-called "facts" from his dreary little myopic visit to Iraq which was carefully controlled to keep the Senator out of harms way during full blown wartime? Or the perspective we receive fortnightly from the people who live in Iraq day-in and day-out, who wonder why all Westerners are fed is the bad news, exacerbated by the "cold, hard" wind of politicians who cared not a whit when they were living under the daily oppression of Saddam?

Ah, Rhode Island! We cope with the quirkiness of our beloved "moderate" Senator Lincoln Chafee. But for how long?

From the Providence Journal:

In a sworn affidavit filed with the federal judge who will be sentencing him on Thursday, television reporter Jim Taricani today refuted the version of events given by lawyer Joseph A. Bevilacqua Jr., who gave him a secret FBI videotape in the Operation Plunder Dome case, in violation of a court order banning its dissemination.

Taricani, in an 8-page affidavit filed just before 1 p.m. with Chief U.S. District Court Judge Ernest C. Torres, calls ``false'' and ``absurd'' Bevilacqua's assertion that he never sought confidentiality and that he'd encouraged Taricani to reveal his identity to a special prosecutor more than 2 years ago.

Can anyone make sense of what is going here?

Taricani risks his well being for a man who, evidentally turns out to be Joseph A. Bevilacqua, Jr., and who finally comes forward under his own inertia, purportedly, with willingness, and without malice; however, we later divine from the unfolding drama that he told Taricani one thing (i.e., that he desired strict confidentiality), while he told the Special Prosecutor another (that he never required confidentiality of Taricani) in giving him the secret FBI videotape in the Operation Plunder Dome case, in violation of the court order banning its dissemination.

We tend to believe Taricani. We still believe he was rightly found guilty of contempt. We do hope now he can wrangle his way free from the debacle.

From Dave Talan in his regular email newsletter: RHODE ISLAND REPUBLICAN UPDATE, a plug for The Senescent Man and NR contributor Justin Katz' Blogs Anchor Rising and Dust in the Light:

CONSERVATIVE R.I. BLOGS

A relatively new occurrence on the internet is the large number of Web Logs (better known as BLOGS). These are basically bulletin boards created by an individual user, where people with similar opinions can post articles or opinions, and anyone can read them. We have been made aware of 2 well-organized blogs in Rhode Island for conservative Republicans.

CHUCK NEVOLA, longtime activist from Cranston, and 2002 GOP candidate for State Senate, urges you to check out his well-written blog at:

http://senescence.blogspot.com

You can E-mail Chuck at chucknevola@hotmail.com

JUSTIN KATZ from Portsmouth (E-mail: jkatz@timshelarts.com ) asked us to pass on this info:

About two weeks ago, I finally kicked off something that had been floating around for awhile; a blog (Weblog) for conservatives in Rhode Island, called Anchor Rising. By way of quick summary, the three authors (at this time) are myself, Carroll Andrew Morse (from Cranston), and Marc Comtois (from Warwick). Andrew writes regularly for an online opinion magazine called Tech Central Station; Marc writes his own blog, The Ocean State Blogger; And I write a relatively successful blog, called Dust in the Light, and have been managing to place opinion pieces with National Review Online.

Some relevant links follow. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or suggestions that you might have, as well as with any ideas of ways in which we can assist you in turning the politics and, therefore, the policies of this state around.

http://www.anchorrising.com
http://www.dustinthelight.com
http://users.ids.net/~marcom/rhodyblogger.html

From today's (Monday's) NY Times, comedian Steve Martin on the coming artifacts from King Tut's tomb to the United States :

It is fitting that so many major news organizations have asked me to herald the coming to the United States of the artifacts from King Tut's tomb. After all, I'm the one who wrote the silly song about him. I stepped over the backs of many Egyptologists who wanted to write this article, but it's better that they learn their lesson now: silly song writers are powerful and vicious people who will stop at nothing to write an article about subjects they have treated in a silly way.

I know that the song "King Tut" has become a standard and that many people believe it has been around for three-quarters of a century and was probably written by Cole Porter or Irving Berlin. But no, I wrote it in my car while driving - and you probably won't believe this - I wrote it in less than 15 minutes. The song broke musical ground in that if you look at the sheet music, there are asterisks where the notes should be, because the song has no tune. You will realize this if you hum the song in your head right now. This of course angered many so-called legitimate songwriters who have to make up melodies to go with their lyrics.

It does strike me as ironic that the song has become the standard reference work on the subject of King Tut. Many of the lines in the song are now believed to be fact. In this article I should - as a serious scholar - set the record straight:

King Tut was not "born in Arizona."

He did not live in a "condo made of stone-a."

King Tut did not "do the monkey," nor did he "move to Babylonia."

King Tut was not a honky.

He was not "buried in his jammies."

Read the Whole think here (free online subscription required).

Joel Rawson is the executive editor of The Providence Journal. Last month he received a Yankee Quill Award from the New England Society of Newspaper Editors. In today’s (Sunday’s) Providence Journal, Rawson writes about his perception of a rapidly evaporating right to freedom of the press. His comments are derived from remarks he gave at the Yankee Quill Award banquet in Cambridge on November 11th.

To wit:

For almost all of my working life I have been dedicated to a simple premise: To know is better than not knowing -- being informed is better than ignorance.

Today, I find this premise being tested not only in the halls of government, but also among our public.

The government has found ways around constitutional law and the public, increasingly protective of individual privacy, is more supportive of the government than of the press.

The First Amendment is a powerful right that protects the press.

Remarks like these are being fueled by the incessant concern folks in southern New England are expressing for Jim Taricani, the reporter from a local RI TV news station who made national headlines for his being found guilty of contempt of court. He was found as such for violating a judge's order to reveal his source of a tape that was evidence in the prosecution of the Plunder Dome scandal involving former Mayor Vincent (Buddy) Cianci.

The Senescent Man is concerned for Taricani too. We don’t like the idea that someone who has gone through heart transplant surgery possibly facing jail time, but Taricani’s actions squarely place the rights to due process against the rights of the Press. Look, the Press has been pretty free in these United States. It's just that folks like Rawson are unhappy that they don’t have absolute freedom transcending all other right – and frankly, we can think of a lot of other very important and necessary rights that we’d put ahead of that one.

It is not a matter of knowing versus not knowing. In a free society, the truth will eventually be made known; it is just that it will be made known in an order where the Press is not necessarily first.

You can read the entire Rawson diatribe here if you are inclined, or if you feel your rights to a free Press might be infringed otherwise.

Being as old as dirt, the Senescent Man has a fond rememberance of the movies of Peter Sellers. And that is why a review by Alessandra Stanley of this HBO made for TV movie entitled "The Life and Death of Peter Sellers" -- to be aired tomorrow (Sunday) night at 9 -- caught our eye. Stanley reviews a TV movie, but asks several important questions for our Age.

Below an excerpt:

Why is Hollywood so addicted to making movies about Hollywood, despite all the evidence indicating that biopics about movie stars almost always flop? And why is our culture so intent on cannibalizing the pop-culture past?

The Peter Sellers story is part of a larger onslaught of show business necrophilia, from cameo re-creations of Ava Gardner and Katharine Hepburn in Martin Scorsese's "Aviator" to "The Real Gilligan's Island," a TBS reality show in which ordinary people compete to impersonate sitcom castaways on a desert isle (dueling Professors and Mary Anns). A new television ad uses computer graphics to resurrect the actor Steve McQueen, putting his image - and mystique - behind the wheel of the 2005 Mustang.

Ours is the Age of Recycling, a time when filmmakers, politicians and advertisers alike rely on the rule that audiences relate most easily and quickly to a familiar famous face. Before narrative, before context, the easiest product to sell in the crowded marketplace of imagery is identification: if the audience knows them, they will come. Biopics of actors are in a way easier to sell than movies about historical figures like Alexander the Great or Alfred Kinsey. In a generation of viewers raised on People magazine, the E! Channel and "Behind the Music," most viewers know actors better than anyone else.

For filmmakers, of course, a movie like "Peter Sellers" is glorified shoptalk - a chance for actors and producers to revel in their own small, self-absorbed world. It's a bit lazy, perhaps, to wrap a script around the one subject that requires almost no research: the narcissistic show-business personality. (Why don't moviemakers ever get over themselves and make a movie about the life and death of Jesus? Oops. Never mind.)

Solipsism is hardly unique to Hollywood: journalists who read and write media gossip Web sites like Mediabistro.com or Wonkette.com are just as guilty. There isn't a medical conference in the world where doctors and researchers just stick to the disease at hand and do not also dissect their colleagues.

Our sentiments exactly. Read the whole thing (free online subscription required).

What we meant to convey on the fly in our previous post was that:

(a) we were experimenting with posting from our web enabled MPX200 mobile phone, and

(b) we did so while we were standing in a line at BWI watching (unfortunately enough) CNN, and

(c) we were grateful that the airport TV wasn't showing MSNBC where we'd have to endure the attrocious "lardball" Chris Matthews, and

(d) CNN is bad enough, why?

Because it was giving us a case of dyspepsia from CNN's promo for Lou Dobbs' program, for which he was attempting to invite every anti-Bush guest he could find. Hence the need for a solid, stomach gurgling "bleagh!"

Here I am at BWI standing in line for a Southwest flight to Providence watching CNN. Bleagh!

The stealing of the governor seat in Washington state continues, only now, with help from Sen. John Kerry. The following is from Sound Politics:

Even though John Kerry didn't have the chance to recount and litigate his way into the White House, he's doing his bit to help try to steal the election for Christine Gregoire:

Former presidential candidate John Kerry contributed at least $200,000 of unused campaign contributions yesterday to help fellow Democrat Christine Gregoire keep the governor's race alive and pay for a statewide hand recount.

The P-I article propagates the Democrats' bogus arguments:

As justification for recount, Gregoire and the Democrats have cited voting "irregularities" in several counties and the fact that Rossi's margin of victory is well within the margin of error for mechanical counters.

Dino Rossi (R) won the election and then won the recount, and now he has to contend with the usual jive from the Dems. Been there. Done that. Stay tuned.